Recent posts by Mona

If you’ve ever been responsible for monitoring models at a quant hedge fund, you know how tricky it can be. One minute everything looks fine; the next, you’re in a full-blown fire drill because of a performance issue you didn’t catch in time. In other cases, you learn way too late that there was something simple you could have changed that would have improved your results significantly, or some specific area that was completely overlooked. But why does this happen? The problem often comes down to granularity—or rather, the lack of it.

In the world of automated trading, quantitative (quant) models are at the core of decision-making. These models analyze vast datasets to execute trades at speeds and volumes that far exceed human capability. However, ensuring that these models consistently perform well requires effective monitoring. Traditional approaches to performance management, which focus on broad financial metrics, IT infrastructure, and standard machine learning (ML) monitoring, are often insufficient. Specialized, deep monitoring is necessary to truly understand how these models behave and to maintain their effectiveness over time.

The Challenges of Algorithmic Trading

Automated quantitative trading systems are sophisticated, but they face a myriad of challenges that can disrupt their performance. From issues with data and models to internal operations, there’s a lot that can go wrong.